Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Sharing Comparison of Credible Patients of Very Low Intelligence and Non-Credible Patients on Neurocognitive Performance Validity Indicators via BrowZine

Comparison of Credible Patients of Very Low Intelligence and Non-Credible Patients on Neurocognitive Performance Validity Indicators
Smith, Klayton; Boone, Kyle; Victor, Tara; Miora, Deborah; Cottingham, Maria; Ziegler, Elizabeth; Zeller, Michelle; Wright, Matthew
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 6 – 2014: 1048 - 1070

10.1080/13854046.2014.931465

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.931465

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.931465

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

Good intro overview article on exploratory factor analysis

This is a nice overview article of exploratory factor analysis. It includes a nice table of "rules of thumb" and an appendix with definitions and explanations of key concepts and terms. A good article for helping teach EFA to others. Click on image to enlarge



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Sharing Yes, but flaws remain via BrowZine

Yes, but flaws remain
Haier, Richard J.; Karama, Sherif; Colom, Roberto; Jung, Rex; Johnson, Wendy
Intelligence, Vol. 46 – 2014: 341 - 344

10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.010

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000828

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000828

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sharing RE: Comment about ‘Fractionating Human Intelligence’. Non-existent flaws in the original article and their relation to limitations of the P-FIT model via BrowZine

RE: Comment about 'Fractionating Human Intelligence'. Non-existent flaws in the original article and their relation to limitations of the P-FIT model
Hampshire, Adam; Owen, Adrian M.
Intelligence, Vol. 46 – 2014: 333 - 340

10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.001

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000737

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000737

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sharing A comment on “Fractionating Intelligence” and the peer review process via BrowZine

A comment on "Fractionating Intelligence" and the peer review process
Haier, Richard J.; Karama, Sherif; Colom, Roberto; Jung, Rex; Johnson, Wendy
Intelligence, Vol. 46 – 2014: 323 - 332

10.1016/j.intell.2014.02.007

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000270

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289614000270

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Monday, September 8, 2014

Sharing The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto via BrowZine

The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto
Gibson, James L.; Nelson, Michael J.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 10 Issue 1 – 2014: 140906191720007

10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

FYI. The MindHub web portal has been updated

I finally got around to updating the MindHub web portal. There is new information under most major categories. Enjoy.

http://themindhub.com/

Saturday, August 16, 2014

Sharing Finger Tapping Test Performance as a Measure of Performance Validity via BrowZine

And yet one more malingering research article

Finger Tapping Test Performance as a Measure of Performance Validity
Axelrod, Bradley N.; Meyers, John E.; Davis, Jeremy J.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 876 - 888

10.1080/13854046.2014.907583

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.907583

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.907583

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sharing Comparisons of Five Performance Validity Indices in Bona Fide and Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury via BrowZine

More malingering measurement research.

Comparisons of Five Performance Validity Indices in Bona Fide and Simulated Traumatic Brain Injury
Bashem, Jesse R.; Rapport, Lisa J.; Miller, Justin B.; Hanks, Robin A.; Axelrod, Bradley N.; Millis, Scott R.
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 851 - 875

10.1080/13854046.2014.927927

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.927927

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.927927

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sharing Are Verbal Intelligence Subtests and Reading Measures Immune to Non-Credible Effort? via BrowZine

File under malingering.

Are Verbal Intelligence Subtests and Reading Measures Immune to Non-Credible Effort?
Sawyer, R. John; Young, J. Christopher; Roper, Brad L.; Rach, Amanda
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 756 - 770

10.1080/13854046.2014.920922

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920922

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920922

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sharing One-Week Practice Effects in Older Adults: Tools for Assessing Cognitive Change via BrowZine

One-Week Practice Effects in Older Adults: Tools for Assessing Cognitive Change
Duff, Kevin
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28 Issue 5 – 2014: 714 - 725

10.1080/13854046.2014.920923

University of Minnesota Users:
http://login.ezproxy.lib.umn.edu/login?url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920923

Non-University of Minnesota Users: (Full text may not be available)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13854046.2014.920923

Accessed with BrowZine, supported by University of Minnesota.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

"Scientizing Culpability: The Implications of Hall v. Florida and the Possibility of a 'Scientific Stare Decisis'" [feedly]



----
"Scientizing Culpability: The Implications of Hall v. Florida and the Possibility of a 'Scientific Stare Decisis'"
// Sentencing Law and Policy

The title of this post is the title of this notable new paper available on SSRN authored by Christopher Slobogin. Here is the abstract:

The Supreme Court's decision in Hall v. Florida holds that "clinical definitions" control the meaning of intellectual disability in the death penalty context. In other words, the Court "scientized" the definition of intellectual disability. This article discusses the implications of this unprecedented move. It also introduces the idea of scientific stare decisis — a requirement that groups that are scientifically alike be treated similarly for culpability purposes — as a means of implementing the scientization process.


----

Shared via my feedly reader


Tuesday, August 5, 2014

The Richard Woodcock Institute for Advancement of Cognitive Assessment: Oct, 25, 2014

The 2nd Richard Woodcock Institute for Advancement of Cognitive Assessment is now scheduled and enrollment is open. Registration and additional information can be found at the WMF web page.




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, July 31, 2014

WJ IV update: Correlations of WJ IV COG g-scores (GIA,Brief,Gf-Gc composite) and WISC-IV/WAIS-IV FS and GAI IQ scores

In the WJ IV technical manual (McGrew, LaForte, Schrank, 2014) concurrent validity results are presented for the WJ IV COG with the WISC-IV and WAIS-IV (click here for WJ IV COG overview and select correlation information from tech. manual).

A number of psychologists have asked about correlations between the primary WJ IV COG g-scores and the Wechsler General Ability Index (GAI).  They are not presented in the technical manual.  I have now computed those correlations, as well as a few others with the Wechsler GAI, and they are now part of the SlideShare at the link above and are also reported below.  Click on image to enlarge.


Article: Assessing Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior




Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Quotes to note: Importance of high quality psychological testing to psychologists




I just read this nice statement at the begging of the following article by Robert J. Ivnik, Ph.D., ABPP Professor of Psychology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

The only professional services that are uniquely psychology's are testing-based assessments. Every other service that psychology offers can be obtained from other professions. In light of testing's central importance to our profession, and considering the number of years that psychologists have been practicing, we assure that our tests are scientifically sound and have been validated for the purposes to which they are put (e.g., research proves that our tests make accurate predictions). Correct? After all, in today's health care environment would any profession knowingly expose its core service to potential attack?

Although testing-based assessments are psychology's defining feature, they may also be our profession's Achilles' heel. Unfortunately, the manner in which many tests have been developed, standardized, normed, and validated may be most kindly described as ‘‘varied'' when it comes to scientific rigor. The science behind some of psychology's older and commercially successful tests tends to be stronger when some of the profit accrued by their sale is devoted to improving the tests. Lacking similar financial resources, many other tests have simply not been developed or validated very well
.

Click on image to enlarge.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Fwd: [ABA-3D] Webinar Announcement



Suspects/Offenders' Issues Series:

Alternatives to Incarceration for Criminal Offenders with Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities

 

August 28, 1:30-2:30 p.m. EST

Jessica S. Oppenheim, Esq.

Director of the Criminal Justice Advocacy Program of The Arc of New Jersey


Criminal Offenders with developmental and intellectual disabilities (I/DD) present unique challenges to the criminal justice system seeking to investigate and prosecute crime as well as to the social service system seeking to serve and assist this vulnerable population. Such individuals make up at least 9 – 10% of the prison population and some studies tell us that they may comprise as much as 50% of adult and juvenile offender populations. It is unquestioned that individuals with I/DD face distinct disadvantages in the system, resulting in convictions for more serious offenses and more prison time.

 

The Criminal Justice Advocacy Program (CJAP) of The Arc of NJ seeks to overcome these disadvantages, while still ensuring that offenders take responsibility for criminal behavior, by arranging specific interventions that provide alternatives to incarceration through offender-specific Personalized Justice Plans. The CJAP also acts as a clearinghouse of information between the criminal justice and social service system in provide training and communication between the two systems. This webinar will review the obstacles and disadvantages faced by this population and provide an overview of the CJAP.  Register here

The Arc's National Center on Criminal

Justice & Disability (NCCJD)

Webinar Series

MISSIONNCCJD will become the national focal point for the collection and dissemination of resources and serve as a bridge between justice and I/DD professionals. NCCJD will pursue and promote safety, fairness and justice for all people with intellectual and developmental disabilities as suspects, offenders, victims or witnesses. For more information: http://www.thearc.org/NCCJD

Contact: Kathryn Walker, Criminal Justice Fellow    Phone: 202.534.3700    Email: NCCJDInfo@thearc.org

 

 

 

 

 

    Kathryn J. Walker, J.D., M.P.H.

Criminal Justice Fellow

The Arc 

1825 K Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, D.C. 20036

Phone:  202.600.3491 | Toll free: 800.433.5255

Fax: 202.534.3731

Email: kwalker@thearc.org

            www.thearc.org/NCCJD

Follow us online at:   

 

 

 

You can help build The Arc by making a secure, online contribution by visiting www.thearc.org/donate. Thank you for supporting the work of The Arc.

 

Saturday, July 26, 2014

More on Greenspan's model of personal competence: Relationship between IQ and social, practical, and conceptual abilities

I am pleased to see that, after a relatively long draught in published research, someone is again investigating the relations between general intelligence, and the primary domains of adaptive behavior, in models (that when examined closely) that are investigating aspects of Greenspan's' model of personal competence. The title, abstract, and key figure from this new research follow. The article can be read here. Kudos to these researchers

Click on images to enlarge





My primary criticism of this study is that it completely ignores the primary foundation research in this area that occurred between 1990 and 2000, some of which are the primary research studies cited in the AAIDD manuals to support the domains of practical, conceptual and social competence (Greenspan's model). I have provided a list of that research, and results from the most prominent article from that group of researchers, below.












Yes, my name is all over these MIA studies (in the current featured article) so some could see my comments as academic sour grapes for being overlooked. But I see their omission as a lack of scholarly rigor by the researchers and the journal who published the current article. All of the MIA studies can be found at the MindHub--scroll down until you see the list of studies shown above. Then click away and download and read. It would have been nice if the new study results would have been integrated with the extant personal competence research literature.

In the final analysis I am pleased that someone is conducting much needed research on these constructs given the pivotal role they play in the definition and assessment of MR/ID.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Friday, July 25, 2014

The new WJ IV: Introductory webinar and author video interviews

The publisher of the new WJ IV Battery just posted an on-line video of Dr. Fred Schrank's WJ IV introduction and overview webinar and brief video interviews of the three WJ IV authors. They can be found here.

[Conflict of interest disclosure: I am one of the coauthors of the WJ IV].

I am much younger looking than my video interview suggests :)






- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Tuesday, July 15, 2014

The Flynn Effect Archive Project: 7-15-14 update

I am pleased to announce an update of the Flynn Effect Archive Project. Information on the project and how to access the on-line archive can be found at this link.

Click on image to enlarge.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad