I learned a lot....most importantly, the apparent lack of understandable information (for judges, lawyers, etc.) [in a single source] regarding basic psychometrics and psychological measurement and how this knowledge void may result in possible improper interpretations and decisions. It is my hope to develop this blog as a resource for individuals involved in such cases. The goal will be to provide balanced and up-to-date information on issues related to this important topic. This will include, but may not be limited, to:
- Intelligence testing practice
- Intelligence testing interpretation
- Differences between intelligence tests
- Relevant theoretical information about intelligence theories
- Controvesies and issues
- Findings of particular cases, court decisions, etc.
- Glossry of understandable terms
- Scholarly journal articles that address this and related issues
- FYI notification of relevant professional publications
- Important psychometric, measurement, and statistical issues
- Relevant research on intelligence tests and research (e.g., Flynn Effect)
- Other issues as they emerge.
This blog is meant to be specialized and will not deal with all issues related to IQ testing and/or the death penalty. There are a ton of websites that provide this information. The intent is to focus primarily on psychometric measurement issues and research related to intelligence testing that may have bearing on capital punishment cases for individuals with an intellectual disability. Also, this website is not pro- or-con re: the death penalty. My goal is to stay issue neutral and not advocate. If some of the posts tend to sound like I am preaching or advocacting, it most likely is due to my fervent passion in the defense of good psychometric and theoretical-based psychological testing and the need to educate others, often via highlighting what I think is bad practice. If I am guilty of any bias, it is not intentional and is due to my strong belief in the science of psychological measurement, a science that can be abused and misunderstood.
I will not comment on details of the case that piqued my interest. Lessons learned from that case will appear as more general posts sometime in the future.
It is my goal to provide objective professional information free from my personal beliefs re: capital punishment.
That's the plan.
(2009) Criminal Mental Health and Disability Law, Evidence and Testimony: A Comprehensive Reference Manual for Lawyers, Judges and Criminal Justice Professionals (458 pgs, $110)
ReplyDeleteTo order and for more info:
http://www.abanet.org/disability/publications/
home.shtml or call: 1-800-285-2221
This is the first book to examine in detail the legal relationships that link criminal justice, mental health, and disability discrimination law.
Chapters include:
A legal history of mental health and disability in the criminal justice system
Overview of legal terms, concepts, developments, and considerations
Criminal incompetency: pre-trial, trial, and post-trial
Insanity and diminished culpability
Dangerousness standards in the law, including death penal
and more...
Thanks. I'll take a look an maybe make a formal blog post
ReplyDeletei think "Mental Retardation" Must be Given Opportunity. See this site mentalretardationsyndromes.com
ReplyDelete