Double click on image to enlarge
Friday, November 20, 2009
iBlogging mobile post: Malingering in litigation text resource
Double click on image to enlarge
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Double click on image to enlarge
About this blog & me
Atkins MR/ID Listserv Description
Click on image to learn more about listserv
Atkins ID/MR Discussion Listserv
Save Pages to PDF file
Applied Psychometrics 101 (AP101) Reports
- AP101: # 1 Understanding IQ score differences
- AP101 #2: What does the WAIS-IV measure?
- AP101:#3 MDS of WJ III and CHC model implications
- AP101:#4 Cluster analysis of WJ III: Theory and interp implications
- AP101 #5: Standard error of measurement (SEM): An explanation and facts for "fact finders" in MR/ID death penalty proceedings
- AP101 #6: Flynn Effect Series-What is the Flynn Effect?
- AP101 #7: Flynn Effect Series--Is the Flynn Effect a Scientifically Accepted Fact?
- AP101 #8: Flynn Effect Series: Brief History of FE--It was NOT given birth by Atkins SCOTUS decision
Applied Psychometrics 101 Briefs
- AP101 Brief #1: g or not to g
- AP101 Brief #2: IQ test battery descriptive comparison information
- AP101 Brief #3: How likely is each score in an IQ SEM confidence band likely to represent the person's true IQ? AP101 Brief #3 (supplement to IAP AP101 #5)
- AP101 Brief # 4: CHC theory and impact on IQ testing brief
- AP101 Brief #5: The Wechsler-like IQ subtest scaled score metric: The potential for misuse, misinterpretation and impact on critical life decisions
- AP 101 Brief # 6: Understanding Wechsler IQ score differences: The CHC evolution of the FS IQ's
- AP101 Brief # 7: Understandig IQ score differences via IQ Test CHC DNA Fingerprint analyses
Special Projects
Professional experts
- D. Watson (Forensic neuropsychology)
- G. Olley (int. disabilities,MR in criminal justice system)
- J. Flynn (IQ,Flynn Effect)
- K. McGrew (psychometrics,IQ theory/tests)
- K.Salekin (MR assess;Atkins cases;forensic psych)
- K.Widaman (IQ theory/tests,ad.beh,MR,psychometrics)
- M.Perlin (mental disability rights and law)
- S. Greenspan (Forensic Consulting)
- T. Derning (Forensic psychology: MR/impairment/waivers/Atkins)
- T. Oakland (Forensic Consulting)
Court Decisions (n=107)
- Anderson v AR (2004)
- Atkins v VA (US Supreme Court, 2002)
- Beckworth v AL (2009)
- Berry v Epps (MS, 2006)
- Bevel v FL (2008)
- Black v TN (2005)
- Blonner v OK (2006)
- Bowling v Haeberline (KY, 2005)
- Bracey v PA (2009)
- Brown v FL (2007, 2009)
- Brumfield v Cain (LA, 2008, 2009)
- Burke v OH (2005)
- Burns v FL (2006)
- Burns v VA (2010)
- Butler v Quarterman (TX, 2008)
- Campbell v CA (2008, 2008b)
- Cherry v FL (2007)
- Cole v Branker (NC, 2007, 2008)
- Coleman v TN (2010)
- Cribbs v TN (2009)
- Davis v US (Maryland, 2009)
- Doss v MS (2009)
- Dufour v FL(2008,2009)
- Dunn v LA (2010)
- Elmore v SC (2010)
- Engram v AR (2004)
- Foster v FL (2006)
- Franqui v FL (2009)
- Frazier v OH (2007)
- Frazier v OH (2008)
- Garcia v Thayer (TX, 2009)
- Green v VA (2006,2007,2008)
- Guevara v Thaler (TX, 2008, 2010)
- Gumm v OH (2006)
- Hall v Quarterman (TX, 2008, 2009)
- Hammond v OH (2008)
- Hearn v TX (2010)
- Hedrick v True (VA, 2006)
- Herring v FL (2009)
- Hicks v GA (2004)
- Hill v OH (2008)
- Hill v Schofield (GA,2010)
- Holladay v Allen (AL, 2009)
- Holmes v LA (2008)
- Hooks v OK (2005)
- Horak v NH (2010)
- Howell v OK (2006)
- Hughes v Epps (MS, 2010)
- Johnston v FL (2006, 2010)
- Jones v FL (2007)
- Jones v NC (2006-2008)
- King v MS (2007,08,09)
- Lambert v OK (2005)
- Larry v Branker (NC, 2009)
- Lewis v Quarterman (TX, 2008)
- Lizcano v TX (2010)
- Lorraine v OH (2007)
- Lott v OH (2007)
- Lynch v OH (2009)
- Lyons v Crawford/Nixon (MO, 2009)
- Maldonado vs Thaler (TX, 2009)
- Matamoros v Thayer (TX, 2010)
- McCoy v OH (2009)
- McDade v US (Al, 2010)
- Mclaughlin v Polk (NC, 2006)
- Miller v AR (2010)
- Mitchell v Epps (MS, 2010)
- Moore v Quarterman (TX, 2009)
- Mundt v OH (2007)
- Murphy v OH (2006, 2009)
- Murphy v OK (2002)
- Nance v AR (2006)
- Nelson v LA (2006)
- Nixon v FL (2009)
- Ochoa v OK (2006)
- Ochoa v Workman (OK, 2010)
- Ortiz v US (2007)
- Parker v US (Military, 2007)
- Parrish v KY (2008, 2010)
- Phillips v FL (2008)
- Pickens v OK (2005)
- Pierce v Thaler (TX, 2009, 2010)
- Plata v TX (2007)
- Pruitt v IN (2005, 2009)
- Ramirez v AZ (2010)
- Robinson v Schriro (Az, 2010)
- Rodgers v FL (2006)
- Rodrigues v Cook (CA, 2010)
- Salazar v OK (2005)
- Stallings v OH (2008)
- State v Duncan (AZ, 2009)
- Taylor v Quarterman (TX, 2005, 2006)
- Thomas v Allen (AL, 2009, 2010)
- Thomas v FL (2004)
- Trevino v TX ( 2008, 2009)
- Trotter v FL (2006)
- Vela v NE (2010)
- Vidal v CA (2005, 2007)
- Walker v Kelly (VA, 2010)
- Walker v True (VA 2005)
- Webster v US (2010)
- Were v OH (2008)
- Weston v AR (2006)
- White v OH (2008)
- Wiley v Epps (MS, 2009)
- Williams v LA (2009)
- Williams v OH (2008)
- Williams v Thayer (TX,2007, 2008, 2010)
- Winston v Kelly (VA, 2007, 2009)
- Woods v TX (2008,20009)
Atkins Related Law Review Articles
- Benforado (2010): The geography of criminal law
- Bilz (2010). Defending the (Mis)Use of Statistics in Law
- Blume et al (2009). An empirical look at Atkins & its application in capital cases
- Blume et al (2009). Of Atkins & Men: Deviatons from Clinical Defs of MR in DP cases
- Bonnie & Gustafson (2007). Challenge of implementing Atkins: How legislatures and courts can promote accurate assessments and adjudications of MR in DP cases
- Bonnie (2004). AP(sychiatric)A resource doc on MR and capital sentencing
- Brown & Murphy (2010). Through a scanner darkley: Functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states
- Church (2003). Mandating Dignity: The United States SupremeCourt’s Extreme Departure From Precedent Regarding the Eighth Amendment and the Death Penalty
- Colon (2009). Capital crime: How CA admin of the death penalty violates the 8th ammendment
- Garrett (2010). Substance of false confessions
- Gershowitz (2010). Statewide capital punishment: The case for eliminating counties' role in death penalty
- Hans (2009). The Twenty-First Century Jury: Worst of Times or Best of Times?
- Harvard Law Review: Admiting Doubt: A New Standard for Evidence
- Hashimoto (2010): Class matters
- Hudson et al (2008). Lightning but no thunder: The need for clarity in military courts re: the def. of mental retardation in capital cases for procedures in implementing Atkins v Virginia
- Kan (2009). Presenting information about mental retardation in the courtroom: A content analysis of pre-Atkins capital trial trancripts from Texas
- Kirchmeier (2010: The undiscovered country: Execution competency and comprehending death
- Kirchmeier et al. (2010). Vigilante Justice: Prosecutor Misconduct in Capital Cases.
- Markel (2009). Executing retributivism: Panetti & the future of the 8th Ammendment
- Monahan & Walker (2010). 25-years of social science and the law
- Mossman (2003). Atkins-A psychiatric can of worms
- Perlin (2009): Can international rights laws be an effective source of rights in correctional conditions litigation?
- Perlin (2009): Some Therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases
- Primus (2010). Structural view of habeas corpus
- Rutledge (2010): Decisional Sequencing
- Ryan (2009). Does the 8th amendment punishments clause prohibit only punishments that are both cruel and unusual?
- Ryan (2010). Judging Cruelty
- Tuerkheimer (2010). Criminal justice at a crossroads: Science-dependent prosecution and the problem of epistemic contingency
- Weithorn (2008). Conceptual hurdles in application of Atkins
- Wexler (2010). Therapeutic jurisprudence and its application to criminal justice research and development
- White (2009). Treated differently in life but not in death
Amicus Briefs
Atkins v Virginia ABA custom Google search
Journals being monitored
- American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- American Psychologist
- Annual Review of Law and Social Science
- Applied Neuropsychology
- Applied Psychological Measurement
- Behavioral Sciences and Law
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Ethics and Behavior
- Int. Journal of Law and Psychiatry
- Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Intelligence
- Journal of American Academy of Psychiat. and Law.
- Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice
- Journal of Law and Criminology
- Journal of Mental Health in Intellectual Abilities
- Journal of Mental Health in Intellectual Abilities
- Law and Human Behavior
- Law and Psychology Review
- Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter
- Open Access Journal for Forensic Psychology
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
- Psychology Public Policy and Law
- Psychometrika
- Punishment and Society
Death Penalty Information Center
Relevant Blogs and Web Pages
Standards, Ethics and Position Statements
Professional Associations & Boards
Blog Archive
-
►
2010
(269)
-
►
July
(23)
- iPost: Judges intro guide to neuroscience
- The Flynn Effect report series: A biref history o...
- iPost: More on race and the death penalty
- Research Briefs 7-26-10: CHC theory & measures (W...
- iPost: Top 10 SSRN downloads
- Research Briefs 7-23-10: Psychology and academic ...
- Atkins MR/ID Capital Punishment Flynn Effect Archi...
- iPost: Annual Review of Law & Social Science Upgra...
- Webster "deadly catch-22" update
- On the road again--blogging lite July 18-21
- Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) based intelligence test...
- Research Briefs 7-14-10: Psychiatric expert witne...
- iPost: Top 10 SSRN downloads
- iPost: New book on intro to neuroethics
- iPost: NPR story on brain science and criminal be...
- On the road again--blogging lite July 7-10
- iPost: Top 10 SSRN downloads
- Law Review Article. Wexler on therapeutic jurispr...
- Sex crimes defendent's privacy claim against psych...
- iPost: Call for Papers
- iPost: More on 11th Circuits en banc review of Atk...
- Indigent defense system info
- iPost Fwd: [StandDown-L] NPR 3-part series - The C...
-
►
June
(26)
- Historical timeline of death penalty
- Atkins MR/ID death penalty listserv update: n=58
- The Flynn Effect report series: Is the Flynn Effe...
- The Flynn Effect report series: What is the Flynn...
- Reprints Available--Sellers 2006 on Malingering
- Psychologists and ethics in international settings...
- Research Brief 6-28-2010: Characteristics of crim...
- Law Review Article: Admitting Doubt: A New Stand...
- Use of WJ III NU Cognitive and Achievement batteri...
- Forensic psychology and law conferences and worksh...
- Court Decision: Hill v Schofield (GA, 2010): "Be...
- Research brief 6-20-10: "Cause" lawyering, individ...
- iPost: Important 11th circuit Atkins ruling on "b...
- Book: Voices of the death penalty debate
- iPost: Special JRP issue on state sentencing and ...
- iPost: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law Table of Contents ...
- iPost: International law conference 2011
- iPost: Call for Papers: special issue on “Diversio...
- iPost: Jose Briseno wins new punishment trial
- On the road again--blogging lite June 8-17
- iPost: Americans have low SCOTUS IQ
- iPost: Is there racial discrim in DP juries?
- Updated K. McGrew blogmaster CV, Bio, and Conflict...
- iPost: More blow back on test author suing to sto...
- iPost: Federal judge rules against fMRI evidence
- Brain injury outcome tests, scales and questionnai...
-
►
July
(23)
Labels
- AAIDD (24)
- AAIDD Death Penalty Task Force (1)
- AB scores (4)
- AB tests (13)
- ABA (12)
- ABA Blawgs (2)
- ABAS (1)
- ABS-II (1)
- academic freedom (1)
- achievement (1)
- ACLU (3)
- adaptive behavior (46)
- AERA (1)
- Alabama (2)
- American Bar Association (ABA) (4)
- American Bar Foundation (1)
- American Board of Forensic Psychology (1)
- American Psychiatric Association (6)
- American Psychological Association (6)
- amicus briefs (8)
- Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences (1)
- anti-social personality (1)
- anxiety (1)
- AP101 (11)
- AP101 Brief # 7 (1)
- AP101 Brief #1 (2)
- AP101 Brief #6 (1)
- AP101 Briefs (8)
- AP101 Reports (7)
- APA (11)
- APA Brief #2 (1)
- APA Div 33 (3)
- APA Div 33 adhoc committee on DP (1)
- APA Div 41 (3)
- APA101 (1)
- APA101 Brief # 7 (1)
- APA101 Briefs (1)
- APD Div 41 (1)
- Applied Neuropsychology (5)
- Applied Psychometric 101 Reports (2)
- Applied Psychometrics 101 Reports (4)
- ARC (1)
- Arizona (2)
- Arkansas (2)
- ASVB (1)
- Atkins (94)
- Atkins cases (17)
- Atkins MR listserv (4)
- autism (2)
- BAT III (3)
- BAT-R (3)
- Behavioral Sciences and Law (4)
- bias (5)
- bilingual (3)
- blogroll (1)
- book review (21)
- borderline intelligence (1)
- brain function (3)
- brain injury (2)
- bright-line (1)
- Briseno (7)
- California (1)
- California Law Review (1)
- CAS (1)
- CAST-MR (1)
- cause lawyering (1)
- Center for Death Penalty Litigation (1)
- CHC intelligence theory (26)
- clemency (1)
- clinical judgment (5)
- Comission on Mental and Physical Disability Law (CMPDL) (2)
- competence (5)
- conferences (1)
- confessions (3)
- conflict of interest disclosures (1)
- constituion (1)
- Cornell Death Penalty Project (1)
- Cornell Law School (2)
- correctional conditions (1)
- court decisions (87)
- criminal law (6)
- criminal personalities (1)
- criminal responsibility (1)
- critical issues (42)
- cultural issues (12)
- DAS (1)
- DAS-2 (1)
- DAS2 (1)
- database (1)
- daubert (1)
- Daubert standard (7)
- death penalty (59)
- Death Penalty Information Center (9)
- definitions (20)
- disability (3)
- discounting principle (1)
- dissertation dish (1)
- DPIC (1)
- DSM-V (4)
- dual diagnosis (1)
- ethics (8)
- Ethics and Behavior (1)
- executions (1)
- executive functions (2)
- expert testimony (8)
- expert witnesses (1)
- experts (19)
- FAS (1)
- Florida (5)
- Flynn Effect (33)
- Flynn Effect Atkins MR/ID Archive Project (4)
- Flynn Effect series (3)
- forensic psychiatry (1)
- forensic psychology (17)
- Forensic science (5)
- FYI (10)
- general intelligence (g) (13)
- geography (2)
- Georgia (1)
- Guest posts (13)
- gullibility (5)
- habeas corpus (7)
- Hispanic (8)
- history (4)
- iBlogging (6)
- ICDP status update (1)
- inboxes (2)
- indigent defense (1)
- individualism (1)
- intellectual disability (55)
- intelligence (54)
- intention (1)
- International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (2)
- international rights (1)
- IQ scores (91)
- IQ Test CHC DNA Fingerprints (3)
- IQ tests (52)
- IQs Corner (2)
- ISIR (15)
- Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice (1)
- journals (5)
- judges (1)
- judicial decision-making (1)
- juries (4)
- juveniles (6)
- KABC2 (1)
- language abilities (2)
- law (10)
- Law and Human Behavior (1)
- Law and Psychology (2)
- Law review articles (37)
- legal research (5)
- Lousiana (2)
- Lousiania (1)
- maladaptive behavior (2)
- malingering (18)
- medical conditions (2)
- medication (1)
- Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter (1)
- mental incompetence (2)
- mental retardation (73)
- Mexican WAIS-III (2)
- Mexico (1)
- military (1)
- Miranda rights (1)
- Missouri (1)
- mock trials (1)
- moral reasoning (1)
- MR/ID characteristics (1)
- must read (1)
- NCME (1)
- Nebraska (1)
- NERONORM (1)
- neuropsychology (10)
- neuroscience (15)
- neurotechnology (10)
- norm obselescence (3)
- norms (4)
- Oklahoma (1)
- Op-Eds (1)
- Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology (1)
- oral arguments (5)
- part vs total scores (11)
- patronizing effect (1)
- PCR (1)
- personal observation (1)
- practice effects (4)
- prisoner privacy rights (1)
- prisons (1)
- professional associations (1)
- professional conferences (1)
- professional opportunities (1)
- Professional Psychology: Research Practice (1)
- psychiatry (1)
- Psychology Public Policy and Law (2)
- psychometrics (41)
- psychosis (1)
- PTSD (1)
- public opinion (7)
- Punishment and Society (1)
- Question (1)
- quotes to note (1)
- race (8)
- Research briefs (17)
- retrospective Dx (1)
- RIAS (1)
- SB4 (1)
- SB5 (1)
- scaled scores (1)
- school records (1)
- scientific evidence (3)
- SCOTUS (11)
- SEM (19)
- Sentencing Law and Policy (3)
- SES (2)
- slippery slope (1)
- social skills (4)
- Spanish (8)
- special masters reports (1)
- SSSQ (2)
- standard error (1)
- standards (10)
- standards of evidence (2)
- standards of proof (1)
- Stanford Binet (1)
- Stanford Binet V (5)
- Stanford-Binet (1)
- States (11)
- statutes (3)
- Sueing psychologists (1)
- Supreme Court (3)
- TBI (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- test authors (1)
- test norms (2)
- test scoring (2)
- testing general (2)
- Texas (6)
- thanks (1)
- Theoretical Criminilogy (1)
- therapeutic jurisprudence (2)
- TONI-2 (1)
- U of Richmond Law Review (1)
- US Judiciary Committee (1)
- US Senate (1)
- videos (1)
- Virginia (2)
- voodoo psychometrics (9)
- WAIS (1)
- WAIS-III (13)
- WAIS-IV (14)
- WAIS-R (2)
- Washing University Law Review (1)
- WASI (1)
- webcasts (2)
- Wechsler batteries (7)
- Wechsler IQ batteries (26)
- Wechslers (3)
- Williams Syndrome (1)
- WISC-III (5)
- WISC-IV (5)
- WISC-R (2)
- WJ III (18)
- WJ-R (4)
- working memory (1)
Followers
Supreme Court Network
About Me
- Kevin McGrew
- Dr. Kevin McGrew is Director of the Institute for Applied Psychometrics (llc). Additional information, including potential conflicts of interest resulting from commercial test development or other consultation, can be found at the IAP web page (www.iapsych.com). General email contact is iap@earthlink.net.
Hit Counter
Google Analytics
0 comments:
Post a Comment